Monday, January 12, 2009

Seduction Tip: Be Rough around the Edges


A new study shows that women prefer men with facial scars for short-term flings.


There is a theory in sleight of hand magic called the “too perfect theory.” The idea is that some tricks are “too perfect,” and either seem implausible or lead the spectator toward figuring out the secret. As an example, in the effect cigarette through coin, if a cigarette passes through a flat piece of metal, spectators’ thinking may lead them toward the secret. But suppose a small hole is drilled in the coin. Admittedly, a cigarette through a tiny hole isn’t as miraculous as a cigarette through a solid piece of metal, but the effect seems more likely.


Another example is a prediction effect. If a spectator is given a free choice of any word in a dictionary and chooses “consternation,” and my prediction is “consternation,” something seems fishy. The prediction is too exact. If on the other hand my prediction is “concentration,” or “constellation,” it seems believable.

The main idea of the too perfect theory is that things can be too neat and tidy for their own good –there is a certain appeal in roughness.


This applies to seduction in that men can be too clean, too nice, too polite. This is easy to do in a culture in which men are raised to repress their natures. Think how often we are told that “violence solves nothing,” and how easily flirting, telling a joke, or saying the wrong word can result in charges of harassment and insensitivity.

Men are also raised to be the fall guy, the upright citizen, the hard-working, self-effacing nice guy who will put in long hours and ask little in return. When a woman has her fling and ends up pregnant, or suddenly realizes she is not as attractive as she used to be and now needs to settle down, she turns to the fall guy, who will raise another man’s child as his own and spend his whole life supporting a woman and her children (which may or may not be his).

Seduction guru Paul Janka observes that he does better with women when he doesn’t shave. A couple of days’ growth of beard is ideal. We know that women who are ovulating prefer men with darker faces, which may explain the greater success of the “scruffy” look.


For years I suffered from being too neat, wearing ties when going out, or a suit and tie. Of course I was excessively polite and sensitive.


When I was a school teacher in Fresno the lady who taught next door to me was a very attractive woman. I was stunned to learned that she had screwed the Larry the janitor, who was loud, rude, vulgar, unshaven, and a smoker. The affair mystified me. Given my understanding of women and my philosophy at the time, it made absolutely no sense.


Only now does it make sense to me. Larry was rough around the edges, reveled in it, and was sexually aggressive. And it paid off.

10 comments:

Imaronin said...

Yep. Dead-on.

Happy New Year BP. Can't say this enough; excellent, excellent blog.

Going back to the PI's soon?

Benedict Smith said...

fyi, i currently teach. not that my blog makes that clear. good post, keep 'em comin'.

Admin said...

Too true. There is a idea in SW Native American art that any piece must have an imperfection or it captures a part of the artists soul forever.

In the same way despite the ever increasing power of computer animation it always looks a little flat because it lacks randomness, a certain degree of chaos.

Regarding female attraction in particular, I think a bit of roughness belies the just don't give a fuck attitude they find so endearing, and also if you are perfectly coiffed it doesn't give them anything to improve upon and you come off as anal, or worse yet, gay. Women suffer under the delusion that we need them to become better men, and as such you need to give them something they can grab onto as their first project when mentally fitting you into their fairy tale timeline of a life.

On a more universal scale, I firmly believe that women fall in love with us for our perceived utility in accomplishing the tasks along that life/timeline. This is why they leave us when we won't marry them on their schedule. They were never truly in love with us for us, but for how we fit into their grand scheme of education, engagement, marriage, house with white picket fence, 2.5 kids, endless familial routine, mid-life crisis, retirement and death. The love a man for the role he fills and will leave if he doesn't dance to their tune. Women love for their contribution to their(genetic) legacy. Men love women for themselves just like they do their children. That's why when we're really in love we'll happily marry someone who brings nothing to the table, she can be uneducated, low earning, with zero prospects for the future, but if shes cute and sweet and we fall for her we could care less. We just want to care and provide for her.

Patriarchy at it's best (minus religious zealotry and with laws to protect the innocent) is more generous to women than they would ever be to us since we're a mere tool to them. Another sad case against the institution of marriage.

http://alphadominance.com/

Benedict Smith said...

admin's spot on. i always felt like i was simply a cog that went into a machine they wanted to start up (the baby making nest building Version 2.0)

Alphadominance said...

This is Alphadominance, formerly admin (finally signed up for blogspot) Anyhow the following is illustrative of this and good for a laugh. You may have seen this before but it's worth repeating.
__________________________________

BoyFriend V 5.0:

Dear Tech Support:

Last year I upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband 1.0 and noticed that the new program began making unexpected changes to the accounting modules, limiting access to flower and jewelry applications that had operated flawlessly under Boyfriend 5.0.

In addition, Husband 1.0 uninstalled many other valuable programs, such as Romance 9.9, but installed undesirable programs, such as NFL 5.0 and NBA 3.0. Conversation 8.0 no longer runs and Housecleaning 2.6 simply crashes the system.

I've tried running Nagging 5.3 to fix these problems, but to no avail.

Desperate


Dear Desperate:

Keep in mind, Boyfriend 5.0 is an entertainment package, while Husband 1.0 is an operating system. Try to enter the command : C:/ I THOUGHT YOU LOVED ME and install Tears 6.2. Husband 1.0 should then automatically run the applications: Guilty 3.0 and Flowers 7.0. But remember, overuse can cause Husband 1.0 to default to Grumpy Silence 2.5, Happy Hour 7.0 or Beer 6.1. Beer 6.1 is a very bad program. DO NOT install Mother-in-law 1.0 or reinstall another Boyfriend program.

These are not supported applications and will crash Husband 1.0. In summary, Husband 1.0 is a great program, but it does have limited memory and cannot learn new applications quickly. Consider buying additional software to improve performance. I personally recommend HotFood 3.0 and Lingerie 5.3. Also, running Nagging 5.3 too often can sometimes cause Husband 1.0 to secretly install Mistress 1.0, which would then require you to run Private Investigator 7.5 utility and possibly even Attorney 9.0, which could lead to a system wide failure and the need to reboot Husband 1.0!

Everybody clear on this now?

--Tech Support

Rubin said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Rubin said...

You are completely right... I have experienced turning girls off simply because they thought that I was too good to be true.

Alphadominance said...

We miss your wisdom Sargent Raymond. Hope you're hangin' and bangin' in the Phillipines.

LibertyAndLove1776 said...

time for revolution!!the spirit of 1776 becomes alive again!!
thomaspainereturns.net

Mark Williams said...

I have noticed this many times. A woman would rather go for a guy thats rough around the edges than a pretty boy who is perfect!