Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Why Do Humans Feel Pleasure?












I got this short response from a reader to my Bulletproof Pimp Philosophy page.


“hedonistic philosophy.... enjoy your pleasure... what you describe will never be true happiness.”


Of course, hedonism as a philosophy means that a person should do whatever feels good. My first impulse is to respond by saying my philosophy is not hedonistic –cocaine, for example, may feel good, but it’s a dumbass idea to start using it. My philosophy is deeper than that, and so on....


But I realize I need to start with a much more basic point. From the reader I get the sense that he is conflicted about pleasure. In his mind, pleasure is associated with sin, guilt, hostility to God, etc.


But let’s ask the question...Why do humans feel pleasure?


If you believe that God created humans, there has to be a purpose to pleasure. If pleasure is an obstacle that has to be overcome, or is a trap to lure a person into sin, then why did God create humans to feel pleasure? Either he screwed up, or was acting randomly, or has a sadistic streak in that he creates humans with weaknesses and sets them up to fail, so that he can punish them. None of which makes sense.


Whether you believe in evolution or in creation by God (and especially if you believe that humans were created), the only solution that makes sense is that all emotions are purposive. In other words, feelings are not random accidents, but serve a purpose. All emotions serve to guide us toward constructive behavior.


For instance, if I eat a fruit, it strikes me as tasting delicious. Why doesn’t a rock taste as good? Fruit tastes good because it is nutritious. Rocks taste bad because they are not nutritious. Is that an accident? No. If I see a dead animal I feel disgust, which is a healthy emotion that prevents me from exposing myself to germs.


I think we need to beware the Christian dichotomy in which some emotions are “bad” and others are “good.” A classic example is anger. Anger is supposedly bad, but what do you feel when you find out a child is being horribly abused? You feel like beating the hell out of the abuser. I argue that’s a healthy response. What kind of person would you be if you learned of a child being physically, mentally, and sexually abused and said, “Hey, it’s not my problem. Oh my gosh, I’m missing the Steelers game!”


Here’s where it gets juicy. Why do men feel attracted to young, beautiful women with big breasts? Why do men want sex with strangers and multiple partners? Either you believe that it’s an accident of evolution, that God screwed up, or that God made humans evil just so he could set them up to fail. Or, you believe as I do, that men’s sexual desires are healthy. Sexual pleasure guides us toward healthy behaviors.


For instance, scientific evidence shows us that there is sperm competition, in which multiple men have sex with one woman, and are engaged in a reproductive arms race to become the father of her child. If humans were monogamous by nature, this wouldn't be so. So we’re faced with a choice, either we’re the product of random genetic mutation in a simian ancestor, or humans were not designed by God to be monogamous.


If we’re supposed to be monogamous, why aren’t we designed that way?

7 comments:

Φ said...

If we’re supposed to be monogamous, why aren’t we designed that way?

Oh!Oh!Pick-me!Pick-me!

Perhaps our feelings, since the Fall and the ensuing corruption of our nature, are not the most reliable guide to morality.

Perhaps our feelings must be governed by, you know, rules and stuff. Maybe my urges to, among other things, kill and screw, might not be an authority unto themselves.

Perhaps even my own personal welfare, even assuming that I possess the infinite wisdom and knowledge to apprehend my welfare correctly, is not the only standard. Maybe I must take into account the social order that protects and sustains me. Maybe I have a duty to help create the circumstances in which my offspring can thrive.

Sgt. Raymond said...

I don't believe in a "fall." In other words, you're saying that God created humans correctly, yet somehow the act of making a wrong choice caused the design flaw that you allege.

My contention is that God made us pretty near perfectly, which holds today.

If our feelings are totally wrong, why don't animals suffer from the same problem? But aside from desires, we see that human societies tend to be organized along certain lines, and those outlines make sense. Mainly, humans are not designed for monogamy-to-the-death, and most societies aren't built on these lines.

I agree to a need for rules, but what rules? Does a need for rules justify women walking around in burkhas? How does a Christian condemn head-to-toe veiling and reduced mobility for women, particularly when it helps stop evils such as lust and consensual sex?

Human beings are social animals. I am not suggesting that the individual serve as a Lone Ranger. You've got to fit into society or at least reach an accommodation.

Thank goodness I live in a society where I can advocate for the ideal life. I'm trying to do my small part by posting here. Thanks for doing your part by commenting.

Φ said...

Who said anything about burkhas? The Saudis will do what they will do, based on the their own culture. That's what separate countries are for. We have never had burkhas in America, nor will we . . . unless we lose a war to the Muslims.

But this is the heart of my point. How can we inspire men to risk their lives for their country if they know that they will come home to find their families have been regarded as prey for the men who stayed home to run things? How can we even produce men suitable for sustaining and defending a civilization except by giving them both a father and mother to raise them?

I'm not making this shit up. Read the chapter in Nick Wade's "Before the Dawn" on the evolution of pair-bonding. Evolutionary anthropologists regard it as the very foundation that makes any male-male cooperation possible, and thus the key to an actual civilization.

So, okay, I will concede that monogamy was easier when people only lived to be about 40. And I might even allow that law and custom should make allowances for departure from the ideal, as it always has in America. I think, and I gather from your other posts that you agree with me, that we presently make too much accomodation in our divorce laws, and in all the wrong ways.

But to hold up a different ideal, one in which there is neither legal nor social protection for marriage, one in which a handful of men (and be honest: you know perfectly well this ideal is non-scalable) dominate the majority of women -- this is an ideal incompatible with liberty in the long run.

You have written before that you are uninterested in "taking one for the team." Fair enough. Do what you will do. But freeloading is not a philosophy worth of the name. Not really.

Lewis Richard said...

People are with the impression that rocking sex is one that lasts for a substantial length of time. Sadly, due to this misconception, even when they are having proper sex they feel unsatisfied. Please note that no ED drug can either prolong the duration of sex and or enhance the sexual pleasure. It is only meant to assist towards having a proper sexual intercourse between a couple. It is also advisable that you avoid wine and whiskey in an attempt to make your night more romantic as drugs like http://www.levitrabliss.com/ are not that compatible together.

Bill12 said...

All information about erectile dysfunction available here http://www.starpills.com
For more information about weekend pill cialis find you here http://www.impotencehealthcenter.com If you want to try best ed pill in europe
try this site http://www.levitraportal.com
Viagra Great sites powerfull information about ed medicien impotence cure

LevitraCialis

Hail said...

Viagra is used in the treatment of Erectile Dysfunction (impotence), but it is not a cure. Impotence can be caused by a number of factors, either physical or psychological. Viagra can help maintain an erection but it will not stimulate arousal.

Sahara Thompson said...

Propecia works by blocking the enzyme 5 alpha reductase. This reduces the level of hormone, DHT, in the scalp and allows hairs to revert to a normal growth cycle. This results in no further hair loss and significantly new hair growth in men with Male Pattern Hair Loss.